Steel Jobs–Lost to Automation, not Imports

Displaying

        Do not think about, write about or deal with  human behavior without determining the effects of incentives. It’s not their money, of course they’ll waste it.

    Wherein we see that automation, not imports, is the cause of the vanished steel jobs.

Contra Trump, Steel Jobs Were  Lost to Robots, not Mexico or China

Contra Trump, Steel Jobs Were Lost to Robots, not Mexico or China
Scott Sumner

CNN has an interesting article on Trump supporters in Youngstown, Ohio. Trump fans will like what they read (even 18 Democratic precinct captains voted for Trump).

But what struck me was the interview with voters. I don’t know what makes me sadder: the fact that they think Trump sincerely wants to help them, or their belief that he could bring back steel jobs if he were sincere. Contrarian intellectuals tell regular intellectuals that we need to “listen” to what the working class voters are saying. But when I listen all I hear are pathetic fairy tales.

Steel employment fell almost 90% since its peak.Back in 1967, the US steel industry employed about 780,000 workers, and produced about 115 million tons of steel.* By 2015, employment had fallen to 90,000, producing about 79 million tons of steel. In both years, the US consumed about 130 million tons of steel. (I’m not sure these figures are exactly right, but I think they are close enough.)

<insert>

   One of the populist responses to “loss of jobs” is punitive tariffs on imports to “keep foreign products out.” This was one of the enduring lessons of the Great Depression, tariffs cause a lowered standard of living.

The bottom line is that even if we still produced 115 million tons, or even upped it to 130 million, the level of employment in steel would be in the 120,000 to 150,000 range. The vast majority of those 780,000 steel jobs were lost to automation, and they aren’t coming back.

Back in the late 1800s, William Jennings Bryan told farmers their problems were caused by eastern bankers, whereas the real problem was that rapid productivity improvements were relentlessly lowering relative food prices and driving farmers into the cities. Trump blames Mexico and China for problems that are actually caused by automation.

* I’m not certain about the 780,000 figure, which was derived by multiplying 4.4% times 17.9 million manufacturing workers in 1967. This source reports 521,000 steel employees in 1974, and another source listed 680,000 in 1953, so I’m not sure the peak employment level. There may be definitional issues from different sources.

PS: The Springsteen song “Youngstown” lamented the collapse of a once proud economic dynamo. It was written in 1995, before Trump scapegoats like NAFTA and China had any significant impact.

<end>

   Beware of populist economics, they’re always wrong.

Government Job or Respect–Which’ll It Be?
Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson, Ph.D.
Author, “Power Teaching: How to Find Someone to Teach Your Child when the Education System has Failed.
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: