The Virtue of No Government Policy

Displaying

qmeme_1452091566267_601

Should be fewer crimes, but the data are still the data.

    Do not think about, write about or deal with  human behavior without determining the effects of incentives. It’s not their money, of course they’ll waste it.

    Wherein we see that governments should do nothing, much sooner.

The Consequences of Doing Nothing
Erick Erickson

"If you see 10 troubles coming down the road, you can be sure that nine will run into the ditch before they reach you," said the ever wise Calvin Coolidge, who was both the best American President and most conservative. Washington politicians of both parties, in an ever-greater quest to play to the crowd and earn free media, are desperate to just do something.

Thus the other day President Obama announced he would take executive action to curtail gun purchases in the United States. His action comes at a time more and more Americans are buying guns to keep themselves safe, convinced the government cannot keep us safe. Gun company stocks soared on the news of the President’s actions.

What of the regulations? Doctors can now feel free to report patients to the government if they determine the patient is mentally ill. Such a patient will be unable to buy a gun. Trust between a doctor and patient is less important than Barack Obama’s desire to just do something.

Likewise, the President will supposedly close the "gun show loophole," requiring background checks at gun shows. There are hundreds of gun shows in the United States and, to my knowledge, every single one already sees purchasers undergoing background checks before buying guns.

The Associated Press, within 24 hours of the president’s executive action, declared that not one of the President’s steps would have kept a gun out of the hands of a mass shooter. But the President shed a tear on live television, so that is okay. He compared Internet gun purchases to shopping on Amazon, which is absolutely not true, but is also something people who have never bought a gun believe.

<insert>

     First the false problem, then the false solution.

President Obama’s actions were designed to just do something. He saw troubles on the road and decided to race toward them instead of waiting for them to bounce off the road. As several studies have noted, gun deaths in the United States are in decline. The one thing not in decline includes armed jihadists shooting up the place. Since Barack Obama became President, those gun incidents are on the rise and his actions will do nothing to stop those.

According to the political left, it does not matter. What matters is that the President shed a tear and did something. The very same people overcome with joy by the power of the President’s tear were just a few weeks ago ridiculing and attacking Republican politicians for offering "thoughts and prayers" over the terrorist attack in California. Their thoughts and prayers were nothing compared to President Obama’s tears and executive order that, again, would not have stopped a single mass shooting.

We have reached peak political theater with this President and his tenure in office. He seems obliged to take actions to "just do something," even when those actions will amount to nothing. The press corps and political left — I repeat myself — hail him as a bold leader who is unafraid to act. Meanwhile, the status quo does not change.

It is a consequence of children running our government. They have decided to forego reality for a fantasy world. Associated Press reporter Matt Lee confronted State Department spokesman John Kirby about this fantasy world. After news of a North Korean hydrogen bomb test, Lee told Kirby, "Every time this happens, we hear from people in this administration and other governments as well that we will not accept North Korea as a nuclear armed state. And yet it is." He also pointed out the United States government said the same thing about Crimea as part of Russia.

Kirby denied the Administration is living in a fantasy world, then refused to acknowledge reality. "At this level of foreign policy, you have to make choices and you don’t have to accept everything," Kirby said refusing to both acknowledge Russia now controls Crimea and North Korea has a nuclear bomb program.

Kirby should not have stopped there. The administration also refuses to accept reality on guns, immigration, education, healthcare, and so much more. But at least the President shed a tear instead of offering "thoughts and prayers." He just did something, though it will amount to nothing.   

<end>

  The best example of “it’s best to do nothing” was the non-response to the stock market crash of 1920. Markets were allowed to correct themselves and they did. In 1929, the government intervened massively and produced the Great Depression.

Government Job or Respect–Which’ll It Be?
Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson, Ph.D.
Author, “Power Teaching: How to Find Someone to Teach Your Child when the Education System has Failed.
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: