Archive for January, 2010

Planning Without Consequences for the Planners

January 30, 2010

 

     The U.S. and Canada both recently announced “greenhouse gas emission targets”. Since there is no greenhouse effect, there can be no greenhouse gases. Nonetheless, they will be reduced and everyone will be happy, especially the leprechauns, who are getting named in record numbers.

    The S.E.C., the same outfit that said Bernie Madoff was an honest investor,  has taken Climate Change into its purview. No matter how often regulation fails, someone continues to have faith in it.

    And now, a case study in “planning” with a reply from one of the elite who maintains that, without people like him, everything would be horrible. “Smart” planning is an oxymoron, but, as Thomas Sowell points out, failure neither discredits of discourages those who think they have special talent in “planning”. My comments in bold.

By John Cotter, The Canadian Press

A new report says urban land-use policies are making homes almost unaffordable in markets around the world, including Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal.

The Demographia International report released Monday looked at 272 metropolitan markets in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Australia, New Zealand and Ireland and calls on governments to allow more housing to be built on the fringes of urban areas to help keep costs down.

The report says Vancouver was the most unaffordable market in the world last year when median housing sale values are compared to median household incomes. Toronto is in the severely unaffordable category. Montreal is classified as being seriously unaffordable.

"There is a view among urban planners that we have got to stop the expanse of the city," said American Wendell Cox, who wrote the report with Hugh Pavletich of New Zealand. "They have a pejorative term – sprawl. It is a synonym, as far as they’re concerned, for sin.

    Only the planners have the key to the universe, so if they don’t OK it, it’s wrong.

"It is very difficult to develop new housing on the fringe. Fringe housing on cheap land has been the secret of the expansion of home ownership."

The authors made their rankings by taking the median residential house values from the third quarter of 2009 and dividing it by median annual gross household incomes. The four categories include severely unaffordable, seriously unaffordable, moderately unaffordable and affordable.

The report suggests that homes in Edmonton and Calgary are also considered to be in the seriously unaffordable category, but Cox noted that prices there are getting somewhat cheaper because of the economic downturn.

Winnipeg creeped (sic)  from affordable to moderately unaffordable. Communities such as Moncton, Thunder Bay and Windsor remain affordable.

But Brent Gilmour, acting CEO of the Canadian Urban Institute, said the report oversimplifies other factors that affect housing affordability, such as regional real estate markets and economic conditions.

    Only the professionals understand the complexity of the situation. The problem with complexity is that, the more complex the situation, the more difficult planning becomes.

The report also fails to include the financial, social and environmental benefits of "smart" urban planning. They include lower infrastructure costs, reducing the need for long commutes and cities designed for people who don’t or can’t drive cars, he said.

"You have to look at the quality of life in a neighbourhood. The ability to walk, to bicycle. Are there parks and recreational facilities that are nearby?" Gilmour said from Toronto.

    Only we can look at the “quality of life”, everyone else just looks at the economics.  Smart planning is ours, everyone else is stupid.

"This study doesn’t take into consideration any of those things."

    Complexity can only be understood by experts in urban planning.

Gilmour said major Canadian cities look at the return on investment when planning new residential areas. Conventional planning based on large subdivisional blocks that require more roads, more sewers and more lighting have long-term costs that may not be reflected in the price of a house.

Municipalities must also plan for the need to look after the growing number of seniors with mobility issues who tend to become isolated in cities with urban sprawl, he said.

    And a little tugging at the heart strings.

Cox said the cost of building new roads and transit services to new housing developments is a pittance compared to how urban consolidation policies boost housing prices and rents.

"You need to begin allowing land to be developed by the free market," he said from St. Louis.

    Mentioning the “free market” will give the planners conniptions like nothing else.

"You need to be allowing the land on the fringe to be opened up to development without the planners telling where the development must occur."

    No studies of the negative effects of “planning” will loosen their grip because there are too many vested interests and too much belief in the sanctity of the INTENT  in planning.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies   

The Ideal Program—Part x + n +3

January 30, 2010

 

      Osama bin Laden has blamed the U.S. for…….Global Warming…….If anyone needed any more evidence of ideology long past reason–past the 72 virgins–Alas, it’s one 72 year old virgin–beyond the random killing of innocents–beyond the axiom that one not sharing the belief is an Untermensch and deserving of death–we have the most irrational of all–Global Warming. I’ll bet a lot of the GW crazies are just delighted with OBL as a new ally in the fight against consumerism, corporate greed and environmental destruction. This new coalition can look down upon the rest of us as misguided fools in need of the kind of guidance only provided by the enlightened and, if we don’t believe them, they’ll kill us.

    A couple of weeks ago, a couple brought in their daughter to be assessed. The mother asked if I’d heard of “Teach Your Child to Read in 100 Easy Lessons”, the program she used to teach her child to read after “official” agencies had failed. I told mom that the “100 Lessons Book” was the super-fast program derived from Direct Instruction. The dad then told me that he had taught the daughter to tell time using the methods described in Connecting Math Concepts, another Direct Instruction program. He was unaware of the methods before he formulated his. I told them that, between them, they had more educational expertise than entire faculties of education and school districts. In itself, that is not difficult, but their accomplishment was impressive because the programs worked so well.

    Finishing up the Characteristics of a Successful Program

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

16. The Skill Set Analysis Should Be Complete

    This is one of the most difficult steps of all. What looks like a skill may be a complex composite and\or have many prerequisites which are not apparent. The only way around this is time-consuming analysis with real people. Logical analysis is only the start.

    There are many ways to ensure that programmers carry out these effort-intense steps. Having only your hands on the economic lever is essential. How to persuade staff?  "Do what I say or get out."  Martin Kozloff,  is the best. That does not mean that the workplace is aversive. It means that there is an understanding that there is a person  who has authority over hiring and firing. It’s quite amusing to watch civil servants talk about “getting staff on board”, “gaining commitment”, “getting consensus” and all the silly things they do instead of being able to require compliance.  This searching for consensus and commitment means that there is no requirement to do effective programs and that effectiveness will  occur sporadically, unreliably and only by certain people.

    Now, Dear Reader, if you found reading this list exhausting, imagine how effortful designing an effective program would be. Then, of course, the program has to be tested and revised, usually several times. The great effort required to apply an effective program properly can only be sustained by someone who benefits from successful application.

    “The real and effectual discipline which is exercised over a workman is … that of his customers. It is the fear of losing their employment which restrains his frauds and corrects his negligence.” Adam Smith

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies   

The Ideal Program—Part x + n +2

January 28, 2010

 

      The U.S. elected a political hack from one of the most politicized and corrupt regions of the country. He promised, and enacted, economic policies which have never worked. How did it all go wrong?

    “There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them.” George Orwell.

         “The government will make all your dreams come true, including your nightmares.”  

 
    More about the criteria for effective programs.

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

    8. Rationale for Client Selection

    In criminal rehabilitation, only high-need, high-risk clients benefit from rehabilitation programs. In general, the program should be tuned to the needs of the clients. Choosing clients who don’t need a program and then attributing their success to the program is one way to appear successful. Boot camp programs in criminal rehabilitation are good example of this legerdemain.

    9. Is integrated inside and outside the program

    Program components should complement rather than contradict each other. Similarly, components should be related directly to the world outside the teaching situation.

    10. Contains techniques for Transfer

    Knowledge gained in educational programs are easily transferable. Two plus two equals four is true in many environments. Transfer in other programs such as criminal rehabilitation and drug and alcohol rehabilitation, is more difficult to get and needs to be built into programs.


    11. Deals directly with the problem

    Many programs try to deal with problems indirectly. For example, a drug or alcohol rehabilitation program may try to deal with “personality issues”. These programs always fail.

    12. Agility

    A program needs to be able to be guided by daily results. Parts of a program may be more difficult for a client than others. The program must be structured so that extra practice may be directed to those parts for certain clients.

    13. Follows the Principles of Learning

    Learning principles such as simple to complex, cumulative review, sufficient repetition, feedback, and making the material consistent with the beginning skill set of the client, will ensure acquisition and maintenance of the program material.


    14. Program Integrity by Staff Compliance

    This is a fancy way of saying that the program is carried out the way it is described. The best way to guarantee integrity if to make economic well-being dependent upon it. The other requirement is a systematic method of monitoring the programmer’s behavior.

    15. Powerful Results


    “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” John Adams

    The results must indicate substantial change rather than statistical significance. Powerful results will always be statistically significant, but the reverse is rarely true.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Ideal Program—Part x + n +1

January 27, 2010

    

     State of the Union: “Government will concentrate on job creation.”  They can concentrate on it all they want, they won’t do it. The data show that any government job creation will only be spin. Only those working in their own interest, motivated by profit, accomplishment, or both, ever create jobs. The government can only pretend. The net result will be job destruction. The government can never give a dollar to anyone it has not taken from someone else. To be as charitable as possible, this mistaken belief comes from substituting the INTEND for the DOES. Politics is all about INTEND.

    The following is from an assignment in a grade 8 history class–verbatim.

“Who did the British North America Act protected?”

“Whose execution of aroused bitter feelings between English and French speaking?”

“For whom did the Canadian Surveyors appeared in the North West to divide the land.”   

    The first could be a typographical error. We all have those, but the other two…?

    A teacher lost his job with the Mafia because he was always making people offers they couldn’t understand.

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:


     4. Based on Studies Which Work

    This shouldn’t have to be said, but it always needs to be said many times. What is the point of doing something which doesn’t work? Note the clumsy use of the Rhetorical Question Device. The based-on-effective principles criterion is a necessary condition which is almost always absent because of the political nature of most programs.

    5. Contains Immediate Feedback to Both Programmer and Client

    The programmer needs to know how he is doing at all times. The surest and most relevant way to tell is by how the client is doing. Immediate, Interim and Final Aims need to be set for every aspect of the program so everyone knows how he’s doing all the time.

    6. High Rate of Behavior from Client

    This is particularly true in academic training where the student needs to have hundreds of facts and dozens of skills immediately available so that fluent behavior is possible. According to the majority of “experts” teaching in schools of education, the classic oxymoron, academic studies are the only activities in human endeavor in which basic skills are irrelevant and practicing them, harmful. According to studies in the real world, fluency is critical in most skills.

    7. Contains Outcome Evaluation

    A program is merely an intention without results. Without results, activity is that most dreaded of all things, a polgram, the supreme manifestation of man’s ability to delude himself and others.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Ideal Programs—Part x + n

January 27, 2010

 

     “We all in the same boat brother. You rock it too far to the right you fall in the waddah, rock it too far to the left you fall in the same waddah, and ‘s just as wet on both sides.” Huddie Ledbetter, folk singer.

    There is a conference in Canada about “rebuilding” Haiti. This is a great opportunity to spend my money doing things which won’t work. Among the early ones is “wind generation”, an idea which isn’t really good for anyone, even destroyed countries. The social engineers are salivating at the idea of economy restructuring and nation building where they can apply their pet theories and other people’s money. Watch the enterprise  fail in a welter of corruption and accusations.

    Watching politicians legislate is like driving behind a car with “I brake for illusions.” or “I brake for delusions.” Politicians should come with a label “I legislate for delusions.” In order to do this one must be ignorant of history and easily swayed by current consensus. For example, the current “warming trend” must be regarded as unique. Then, blame must be attached to negatives such as greed or conspicuous consumption such as driving expensive vehicles. Once the terror and perpetrators are identified, everything is possible. A socialist will allow you complete freedom so long as everything not banned is compulsory.

from the book: Shadow Dancing

on the Grave of Hope:

    Continued outline for real programs.

1. Use of Positive Reinforcement

    Motivating and supporting the many hours of participation required by a successful program compels  the astute use of many sources of positive reinforcement. Clients need to be told they are doing well, only when they are doing well, of course, and see that they are doing well in all the components of a program.

    2. Time efficient (Dense)

    Efficiency, in this sense, refers to the amount of behavior change per unit time. This means that exercises are presented as quickly as possible and the circumstances are set up so that clients respond quickly. Something useful should always be happening.

    3. Scripted

    A scripted program describes in great detail what the program provider should be doing and what the client should be learning. Scripting ensures that essential elements are covered in the correct order. A scripted manual guarantees that all providers present the program as designed and don’t leave out the requisite positive reinforcers.

    One curious objection to the use of scripting is that it limits “spontaneity” and “creativity”, exactly the kinds of activity which must be limited in program providers. A surgeon’s pirouette during an operation might show delightful spontaneity and creativity, but is not recommended for patient well-being. Irrelevant behavior is distracting and time-wasting.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies   

Effective Programs—Continuing

January 25, 2010

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

    In summary, a psychologist, or anyone in the social services, must avoid the siren songs of employers, laymen, other psychologists and the media. These sources will always lead astray and ensure that programs are polgrams, trendy and useless.

Characteristics of a Successful Program

Points for something which works:

1). Based on concepts which have produced results.

2). Failure results in program revision, not client excoriation.

3). The program is evaluated constantly, not after several years.

4). The program is tested constantly, the clients are tested once.

5). The program is scrapped if it doesn’t produce results based on the DIW criteria.

    Sports commentators are always reminding us that successful athletes and teams “do the little things right.” The things are little only because they make up a small part of the whole. Without all of the “little things”, nothing exists.

    We have seen that the misapplication of social sciences can produce "positive harm", an oxymoron, such as the case of false accusations based on repressed memories and non-occurring sexual abuse. The only positive aspect is in the intention  of the program. An ounce of result is worth the world’s weight in intention. Proper application also produces non-results when programs are ineffective.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Avoiding Bad Influences

January 24, 2010

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

What’s a Psychologist to do: Avoiding Insidious Influences

    An insidious influence is any reinforcer source which  turns one in the direction of doing things which are useless or harmful or doesn’t turn one in the direction of doing things which are useful. One source is the people who pay the wages of a psychologist. I call this, "Hiring an expert and then telling how to do their jobs." When working for a government agency, I was asked many times to do psychodynamic, one-to-one counselling, presumably because the talk shows, soap operas and movies-of-the-week told laymen that this was what needed doing.

    Another deadly influence is laymen who are very willing to listen to you tell them what they think they know. The media are especially dangerous because they will provide a voice to anyone who has something dramatic and heart-rending to report or lie about. In education, rapt attention will be paid if you talk about student deficiencies such as victimhood from social injustice, dyslexia, dyscalculia, broken homes, lack of discipline, the latest funding cut and etc; everything, in sum, except how to teach students better. In correctional rehabilitation, people like to hear about the importance of abuse, the breakdown of society, poverty and discrimination as the basis of criminal behavior. They also listen if you talk about how terrible criminals are and how depth psychotherapy fixes them because it gets to the "real" reasons. In short, you must entertain and/or blame. Start to talk about effective rehabilitation and audience eyes begin to glaze. They will listen to certain things, dispute others and get genuinely nasty about others. Laymen must be ignored. One of the most difficult things about being a psychologist is that everybody is one.        

    No one who has read this far will be surprised that other psychologists are a particularly malignant source of misdirection, because the majority of psychologists do not have to produce results. Most of the misguided have never been influenced by any DIW aggravations. Psychology conferences are famous for the tedium of their secret language and statistics, but they really are places where people get together and talk at great length and detail about very little. If a particular personality test is popular, there will be many workshops on it but little or nothing on how to change people’s behavior. If something makes the movie-of-the-week, be assured that it will make the psychology-meeting-of-the year. Repressed memories, abuse and multiple personalities have all run their nonsensical course. When someone asks me, after I’ve attended one of these presentations, purely for comedic value, what I thought about it, I reply, "Who cares how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, what’s really important is how many can dance on the point." This usually sends them mumbling away, leaving me in enchanted peace. If you care, four angels can dance on the point of a pin. It has to do with the magical number related to the ethnically  sensitive four directions in the full circle of Life (just kidding). I personally do not attend gatherings of psychologists lest I become infected by “consensus disease”. Consensus disease occurs when one believes he knows and can do something important because he agrees with the majority.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

The Post Office and Contingencies

January 24, 2010

 

    Passages in quotes from a column by Herbert Grubel: –Return this monopoly to sender–in the National Post, January 21, 2010.

   At the risk of being parochial, I will talk about Canada Post, although the concepts apply to any government-mandated “service”, anywhere.

      “Canada Post is a dinosaur that has lived far too long. Only a monopoly protected by government can treat the public the way it does. On Jan. 11, the cost of stamps for a first class letter went from 54¢ to 57¢, for an increase in 5.5% over a year in which consumer prices rose only half that rate. Since 1971, when a stamp cost 7¢, the cost of mailing a letter has jumped by 714%. General inflation was only 443%.”

      “Canada Post publicly justifies its record of price increases by reference to a decrease in the volume of business, the cost of mechanization and the need to serve more customers.  No one really knows whether this explanation is valid. Its operation and accounting are simply too complex.”

    A decrease in volume of business leads to an increase in consumer costs–only in government mandated and protected monopolies. The operation and accounting are so opaque than no one can understand them. Typical of a government operation. True costs will never be known.

      “However, we do know from history that when governments remove the protection of monopolies, costs drop and consumers are served better. There are many reasons for this result, but again history shows that the end of the monopoly is accompanied by the loss of power by unions to extract high levels of compensation, to protect employees from the consequences of poor performance and to prevent the introduction of labour-saving technology.  Management also becomes more efficient and willing to resist union demands because government policies no longer permit higher costs and poor service to be passed on to consumers.”

    Note that the unions, the producers, come before the consumers.

     “Canadians have the right to buy their goods and services from any supplier who offers them the best price and service. The government has no right to force Canadians into buying first class mail services from the monopoly Canada Post. It is time for genuine competition in this market.”

    That’s quite logical, but it won’t happen. I do predict that the increase in postal rates will continue as will the non-delivery of parcels. Most of us have nothing to do but go down to the local post office to pick up things we pay to be delivered. And that’s just one of the ways contingencies work.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Results, Programs and Training

January 23, 2010

    Politics is passing strange. An upset win in a special election in Massachusetts puts an end to cap-and-trade, the notion of trading carbon offsets. Get out of carbon trading while you can. It’s over. Obama’s hysterical notions about “green jobs” and massive subsidies for “green projects” which make no economic, moral, or common, sense have been ended although it will take a few years for the ghost to disappear.

    That some people are wrong is inevitable. I only get angry when they’re wrong with my money.

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

Why Isn’t It Better?

    Powerful programs are not run because; 1) they are more difficult, requiring a lot of effort in researching, formulating and carrying out and effort is generally only put forward when necessary. Typical programs are much easier because they have no criteria to meet. When introducing a new topic, for example, the teacher can engage in "stream of consciousness" or "automatic talking" without worry about following any principles of instruction. All he has to do is “cover” the material. Doing things improperly is much easier because it requires much less planning, record keeping and keeping track of data sheets and exercise sheets, 2) practitioners tend to rely on "experience" and personal contacts rather than looking for successful programs, 3) practitioners are prone to influence from laymen by explaining, conceptualizing and carrying out programs in a layman-like manner and having their ineffective practices reinforced by laymen who understand and agree with the principles and by other practitioners who believe in the importance of consensus..

    In order to be effective, the social services need to a) evaluate constantly and consistently every part of every program and especially evaluate how well the program works, b) change their basic assumptions from internal, hypothetical causation to environmental causation which can be changed, c) operate programs which are systematic that can be carried out by everyone in the same way. Program integrity is essential. If the program is not being done as described, the program that is evaluated will not be the program that is done, d) set up programs so that the procedures are carried out efficiently on a day-to-day basis. Staff training is important but staff maintenance secures program integrity after training. Training only lasts a small percentage of the time but maintenance lasts forever, e) avoid political influence. A program set up because of political considerations such as gender, race, class or ethnic sensitivity will fail as hundreds of others have failed. A polgram is not a program and there is no value in implementing it., f) A trained, effective practitioner is exceptional and should be valued like a rare jewel., g) It is almost impossible to create a good program within the existing educational, clinical or correctional structure. Indifference, sabotage and worse will ensure the non-success of any program which causes the members of a government organization to relinquish power or put forth more effort by requiring them to change their standard. lackadaisical approach.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies

Public Education and Soviet Cars

January 21, 2010

 

     About the icon, Che Guevera. What Fontova doesn’t mention is the execution by sledgehammer or starving to death in a locked cell. “Of course we execute.” There is no end to cruelty justified by “knowing” you’re right on the way to Nirvana.

      “According to the “Black Book of Communism,” those firing-squad executions had reached 14,000 by the end of the ’60s, the equivalent, given the relative populations, of more than 3 million executions in the U.S. “I don’t need proof to execute a man,” snapped Che to a judicial toady in 1959. “I only need proof that it’s necessary to execute him! … Judicial evidence is an archaic bourgeois detail. We execute from revolutionary conviction.”

       Upon arriving in Havana in January 1959 after an utterly bogus guerrilla war (The New York Times breathlessly reported of “thousands dead in single battles!” The official tally compiled by the U.S. embassy after two years of ferocious “civil war” was 184 dead on both sides, half New Orleans’ annual murder tally.), Che Guevara immediately recognized the moat around Havana’s old Spanish fortress La Cabana as a handy-dandy, ready-made execution pit. So he promptly put his firing squads to work in triple shifts.

     Edwin Tetlow, Havana correspondent for London’s Daily Telegraph, reported on a mass “trial” orchestrated by Che Guevara in February 1959, where Tetlow noticed the death sentences posted on a board before the trial had started.” Humberto Fontova.

    “Ontario’s Green Energy Act, said the Premier, is the “best of its kind, best in class, in North America.” By that he means, it offers the biggest giveaways, the fattest subsidies and the most generous guarantees. To hell with good economics, open markets and competition. Using dictatorship-style powers, the McGuinty government can order its subsidiary agencies — power authorities, distribution companies and regulators — to set rates and build power lines. All the Samsungs of the world have to do is show up and receive Ontario’s Feed-in Tariffs — guaranteed above-market power rates of 13.5¢ a kilowatt hour for wind and 44.3¢ for solar power.” Terence Corcoran–National Post–January 22. 2010. As Ontario tries to outdo California to be the trendiest–that is, the most mistaken jurisdiction in the world. Being world-class is nice, but leading in stupidity is not a proud boast.

from the book: Shadow Dancing on the Grave of Hope:

      There are  no organized constituencies demanding change in the social sciences, but there are large, powerful and well organized constituencies such as unions and professional organizations lobbying vigorously, and viciously, for the status quo and more "professional" control. These organized constituencies must concentrate on the producer and not the consumer. This keeps ineffectiveness alive and stifles innovation. When an industry or a union  is protected against competition, the rest of us are protected against efficiency and improvement.

    There are very negative effects of implementing nonsense. This has been shown with Whole Language, repressed memory and facilitated communication, multiple personalities, talking "depth" therapies, manipulatives and "whole mathematics" teaching, invented spelling and various kinds of ineffective programming in all areas. The negative effects fall on the clients while practitioners get status and money. No teacher, principal or educational administrator has ever lost a penny of pay for failure to teach any of the thousands of students I have seen in 37 years. The public education system is no more capable of producing effective education than the Soviet economy was of making reliable cars or useful toilet paper.

Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.