The U.S. and Canada both recently announced “greenhouse gas emission targets”. Since there is no greenhouse effect, there can be no greenhouse gases. Nonetheless, they will be reduced and everyone will be happy, especially the leprechauns, who are getting named in record numbers.
The S.E.C., the same outfit that said Bernie Madoff was an honest investor, has taken Climate Change into its purview. No matter how often regulation fails, someone continues to have faith in it.
And now, a case study in “planning” with a reply from one of the elite who maintains that, without people like him, everything would be horrible. “Smart” planning is an oxymoron, but, as Thomas Sowell points out, failure neither discredits of discourages those who think they have special talent in “planning”. My comments in bold.
By John Cotter, The Canadian Press
A new report says urban land-use policies are making homes almost unaffordable in markets around the world, including Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal.
The Demographia International report released Monday looked at 272 metropolitan markets in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Australia, New Zealand and Ireland and calls on governments to allow more housing to be built on the fringes of urban areas to help keep costs down.
The report says Vancouver was the most unaffordable market in the world last year when median housing sale values are compared to median household incomes. Toronto is in the severely unaffordable category. Montreal is classified as being seriously unaffordable.
"There is a view among urban planners that we have got to stop the expanse of the city," said American Wendell Cox, who wrote the report with Hugh Pavletich of New Zealand. "They have a pejorative term – sprawl. It is a synonym, as far as they’re concerned, for sin.
Only the planners have the key to the universe, so if they don’t OK it, it’s wrong.
"It is very difficult to develop new housing on the fringe. Fringe housing on cheap land has been the secret of the expansion of home ownership."
The authors made their rankings by taking the median residential house values from the third quarter of 2009 and dividing it by median annual gross household incomes. The four categories include severely unaffordable, seriously unaffordable, moderately unaffordable and affordable.
The report suggests that homes in Edmonton and Calgary are also considered to be in the seriously unaffordable category, but Cox noted that prices there are getting somewhat cheaper because of the economic downturn.
Winnipeg creeped (sic) from affordable to moderately unaffordable. Communities such as Moncton, Thunder Bay and Windsor remain affordable.
But Brent Gilmour, acting CEO of the Canadian Urban Institute, said the report oversimplifies other factors that affect housing affordability, such as regional real estate markets and economic conditions.
Only the professionals understand the complexity of the situation. The problem with complexity is that, the more complex the situation, the more difficult planning becomes.
The report also fails to include the financial, social and environmental benefits of "smart" urban planning. They include lower infrastructure costs, reducing the need for long commutes and cities designed for people who don’t or can’t drive cars, he said.
"You have to look at the quality of life in a neighbourhood. The ability to walk, to bicycle. Are there parks and recreational facilities that are nearby?" Gilmour said from Toronto.
Only we can look at the “quality of life”, everyone else just looks at the economics. Smart planning is ours, everyone else is stupid.
"This study doesn’t take into consideration any of those things."
Complexity can only be understood by experts in urban planning.
Gilmour said major Canadian cities look at the return on investment when planning new residential areas. Conventional planning based on large subdivisional blocks that require more roads, more sewers and more lighting have long-term costs that may not be reflected in the price of a house.
Municipalities must also plan for the need to look after the growing number of seniors with mobility issues who tend to become isolated in cities with urban sprawl, he said.
And a little tugging at the heart strings.
Cox said the cost of building new roads and transit services to new housing developments is a pittance compared to how urban consolidation policies boost housing prices and rents.
"You need to begin allowing land to be developed by the free market," he said from St. Louis.
Mentioning the “free market” will give the planners conniptions like nothing else.
"You need to be allowing the land on the fringe to be opened up to development without the planners telling where the development must occur."
No studies of the negative effects of “planning” will loosen their grip because there are too many vested interests and too much belief in the sanctity of the INTENT in planning.
Cheerio and ttfn,
Grant Coulson
Cui Bono–Cherchez les Contingencies